Is it Intelligence?

The American Spectator Online has an excellent article by Dan Peterson on Intelligent Design. He is not so interested in proving or disproving it as he is discussing why the Materialists are struggling so hard to keep it from being heard. At the heart of the struggle is an interpretation of reality itself so profound that the Materialists need to monopolize it for philosophical reasons. ID in and of itself proves no one religion true but does complete devestate one certain religion - the religion of Atheism (and regardless of what anyone says -- IT IS A RELIGION!)

He releases a quote by Richard Dawkins (author of The Selfish Gene) which reveals something quite chilling:

Richard Dawkins, again, exemplifies the mindset. Long before the Dover suit, he argued that libel laws (much more formidable in England than here) should protect "objective truth," and should punish "lies that may not damage particular people but damage truth itself." He would extend legal sanctions to "all deliberate falsifications, misrepresentations, of scientific truth." Why should an individual have to be damaged, he wonders, before we "prosecute a book which wantonly publishes lies about the universe"?

Can you guess which book he is talking about.