So Many Rumors
The vast majority of the hits are "reel-in" sites for porno pay-sites. (ie free sites with no content used to draw in people looking for porn and send them on wild goose chases until they give up and pay.) Misleading draw-ins are their bread and butter.
There's even contests which include some interesting suggestions. (language warning!)
And you know, she’s totally gotta have a naked picture out there someplace. And if not, someone should quickly photoshop one up.
followed by a bit of ribald fantasies about her by the writer and then this line:
So, with THAT NOTE, we OFFICIAL LAUNCH THE SARAH PALIN NAKED PHOTOSHOP CONTENT! Create, inspire, share! Send us your hottest pics of Sarah Palin
The site in question does have a very poor resolution photo of a nude woman whom they first say is her then they say it isn't. There is also a picture of "her" in very tight mini-skirt that they acknowledge as photoshopped. Though other sites claim that it is real.
For starters the head doesn't even have the right proportion for the body but anyway it looked kind of familiar to me. I had seen that picture before but had to think about where.
Then it hit me! Some time ago I filled out a "Personals" questionnaire (foolish I know) and started getting a lot of spam from "Hot Women Your Age in Your Area" including what I assume to be stock pictures of "hot older women". There was one picture that appeared a couple of times a week and one of her pictures was still in the Delete box of my Outlook Express. (I am very negligent at keeping it cleaned out.) Does she look familiar?
Why the fishing expedition? Why photoshop pictures? They are determined to find something even if they have to create it. If it was really there it would be all over the net by now.
I could be wrong, but I don't think there are any really bad pictures out there. (Bikini pictures mean nothing and offend very few.) This is nothing more than a fishing expedition/smear campaign.